Unwanted intrusive thoughts in the context of neonatal care: coping with the ‘what ifs?’

As neonatal psychological professionals, we are hearing of increased levels of intrusive thoughts of harm in both neonatal staff and parents since the Lucy Letby trial. This increase makes sense in light of what we know about the experience of intrusive thoughts. Understandably, these thoughts can lead to high levels of anxiety and can start to undermine confidence and trust in ourselves and others. This paper aims to help colleagues understand what these thoughts are, how they arise, normalise experiencing them and reduce anxiety about their relationship to actual harm.

Fiona L. Challacombe
Lecturer in Perinatal Clinical Psychology, King’s College London, in conjunction with the Neonatal Leads for Psychological Practice (NeoLeaP; TABLE 1)
fiona.challacombe@kcl.ac.uk

Challacombe F.L., Chilvers R., Butterworth R., Atkins E., Barr K., Cole S., Cordwell J., D’Urso A., Evans D., Higgins S., Marsh A. Unwanted intrusive thoughts in the context of neonatal care: coping with the ‘what ifs?’ Infant 2024;20(1):16-19.

Full text available by subscription ...

The full text of this article is available to subscribers in text, and in Tablet/iPad format and as a PDF file.

Please subscribe and log in to see the full article.

Keywords

neonatal unit; perinatal; intrusive thoughts; healthcare professionals; anxiety

Key points

Intrusive thoughts of infants being harmed are common in new parents and in healthcare professionals.
Thoughts can be about accidental or deliberate harm by self or others.
People feel distress about intrusive thoughts that they do not want to happen and will not act on.
Reducing threat in the environment and responding compassionately to these experiences will help to reduce the impact of intrusive thoughts and prevent them interfering in the care of the infant.

Also published in Infant:

VOLUME 15/ISSUE 2, MARCH 2019

BadgerNet admission data entry: a quality improvement project

Completion of BadgerNet data is important for every neonatal unit yet often it is incomplete and the quality/accuracy of the data could be better. The aim of this quality improvement project was to monitor accuracy and compliance with National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) data and to audit the accuracy of BadgerNet admission summaries. The project assesses outcomes in the local neonatal unit at Kettering General Hospital before and after the formal introduction of a set of improvement measures.